Project 2025 is in Play. Think of it like a Belichick Playbook for a Conservative Take Over of America

Think of it as the Bill Belichick playbook for rebuilding the Patriots. Except instead of scheming ways to beat the Jets, this one’s the “no more compromise” manual for stopping fifty years of liberal momentum.
And let’s not forget: Along with being a football genius, Belichick had a history of bending rules — Spygate, Deflategate — winning at all costs because the payoff outweighed the fine. Project 2025 runs on the same logic: the prize of reshaping America for decades is worth a little bad press. The twist? Belichick had Brady — the GOAT QB — to run his system. Project 2025? They didn’t want a GOAT President. They just needed someone who believed he was—someone ego-driven and devoid of empathy enough to soak up the chants, take the hits, and think he’s the star while the machine runs the real plays behind the curtain.

Why Project 2025 Exists — Five Decades of Liberal Wins
Here’s the backdrop. For half a century, liberals racked up institutional wins that reshaped schools, workplaces, laws, and everyday life. These weren’t just political victories; they were structural changes that have endured long beyond election cycles. (If they had a theme song, it would have been Aerosmith's "Eat the Rich.")

• Civil rights (1960s): Laws ending segregation and outlawing discrimination.
• Women’s rights & Title IX (1972): Equal access in education and athletics.
• Roe v. Wade (1973): Reproductive rights enshrined for decades.
• Environmental protections (1970s–80s): EPA, clean air and water acts.
• Marriage equality (2010s): Legal same-sex marriage across the country.
• Affordable Care Act (2010s): Expanded healthcare coverage for millions.

From the conservative perspective, each was another punch in the nuts. By the 2010s, they were tired of playing defense−and the stomachache. And elections aren’t enough. This time, they’re out to change the rules of the game itself. Project 2025 is the result — a grudge match turned detailed strategy manual and execution plan. For any American with an empathetic bone in their body it’s a nightmare coming true.

A Mirror from History: The Progressive Playbook
Funny thing is, conservatives aren’t the first to do this. A century ago, it was progressives writing the playbook.

Progressive Era Blueprint (1890s–1930s)
Back then, America was a mess of robber barons, monopolies, child labor, and political corruption. Progressives didn’t just protest — they built institutions and rewrote rules.

The Players:

• Settlement Houses & Social Reformers: Jane Addams and others, building community services where government failed.
• Muckrakers (What the Hell Does That Mean?): Muck is the dirt, the filth, the crap the powerful want hidden. Raking is dragging it out into daylight. Journalists like Ida Tarbell (Standard Oil), Upton Sinclair (The Jungle), and Lincoln Steffens (city corruption) were the muckrakers of their time, the watchdogs with ink-stained fingers, exposing rot.
• Labor & Populist Movements: Early unions and grassroots parties pushing for worker protections.
• Academics & Policy Shops: Universities became policy labs, drafting model laws — the “Wisconsin Idea” was basically the Heritage Foundation for the left.
• Politicians: Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, then FDR with the New Deal — institutionalizing reforms.

The Playbook (Progressive Era Edition):

• Break up monopolies (antitrust laws): Big trusts like Standard Oil and the railroads got busted up so no single company could own the whole field.
• Regulate food, drugs, and labor conditions: The Jungle made people gag, and out of it came the FDA, workplace standards, and protections against child labor.
• Democratic reforms (direct election of senators, women’s suffrage): The 17th Amendment (1913) put senatorial election decisions in the hands of voters instead of backroom statehouse deals. The 19th Amendment (1920) gave women the right to vote — doubling the electorate and forcing politicians to deal with half the population they’d ignored.
• Social safety nets (Social Security, unemployment insurance): The New Deal turned government into a backstop for workers, seniors, and families for the first time.

Many of those reforms became permanent fixtures: the FDA, SEC, Social Security, labor protections, and yes — women voting and citizens directly choosing senators. They didn’t just win elections; they rewrote how democracy worked.
 
That’s the historical mirror. A century ago, progressives built their playbook to expand democracy and spread power wider and towards the people. Today, Project 2025 is conservatives writing their own — only this one’s about contracting, concentrating, and dismantling everything that got away from them.
 
What’s in the Playbook? (The Cliff Notes)
Project 2025 is a 900-page manual, not a suggestion box. Here’s the cheat sheet:

• Education: Shrink or dismantle the Department of Education; push culture-war fights into classrooms.
• Diversity/Equity: Kill DEI programs, swap in “meritocracy” language. Put a bullet in “woke”.
• Social Issues: Roll back abortion access; undercut LGBTQ protections.
• Immigration: Tighter borders, faster, more dramatic deportations, expanded enforcement.
• Executive Power: Concentrate more authority in the Oval Office.
• Federal Workforce: Purge “disloyal” civil servants; replace with loyalists.

 
If you’re seeing these plays being run, you’re watching Project 2025 in action.

Trump is Neither Mastermind nor Architect. He’s the lightning rod, convinced the storm is following him because he’s special.
Trump isn’t the strategist. He’s the petulant puppet in denial. The brilliance of the machine is finding a guy with no empathy, no patience for detail, and an endless hunger for attention. Wind him up, shove him in front of cameras, and while he’s busy soaking up chants, Heritage and friends are pulling the strings.
And the cruel joke? He thinks it’s all him. He believes he’s the genius. Meanwhile, he’s the perfect distraction.
You might even feel for him. He’s been the egotistic fiddle the conservative movement needed. They gave him the illusion of power, built a billion-dollar orchestra around him, and let him think he was conducting.
Now? He might actually believe it. He’s riffing off-script, convinced the show only exists because of him. That’s risky. The machine didn’t spend years writing a 900-page plan just to let their frontman wing it.
So, what happens? Do they tighten the leash? Because for The Heritage Foundation and the rest of us, a loose cannon puppet who can’t feel the strings is a very dangerous thing to have sitting in as the leader of the free world.

Final Word
Trump went on TV and said, “I have nothing to do with Project 2025. I know nothing about it.” Stephen Miller waved it off too, claiming he was never really involved. Come on. That’s straight up lying. And lying has to mean something. If people in power can just deny with a straight face while running the playbook word for word, then what’s left?
 
Don’t be duped. Actions speak louder than denials. If lying becomes normal, we all give up trying to separate fact from fiction. That can’t be how tomorrow’s American society works.
 
As much as it was torture to watch a Bill Belichick post-game interview, you knew (for the most part) he was being straight with you. Bitchy as it was, it was honest.
 
Fact: Project 2025 is in play. The plays are easy to recognize if you know the script. Spend a few minutes watching the first few minutes of the videos below. See what adds up for you. And ask yourself: Why are they lying?


Video links:
 
CNBC Trump’s Presidential Debate with Kamala Harris: Trump denies having anything to do with Project 2025: https://youtube.com/shorts/2GJwYsNsGdk?feature=shared
 
MSNBC interview with Stephen Miller where he denies Project 2025 being a foundation of Trump policy, despite several alignments with the election campaign playbook: https://youtu.be/65hE3Ll1Fec?feature=shared
 
What is Project 2025? Defined by WSJ: https://youtu.be/y16SZhZJHkI?feature=shared
 
PBS Newshour Explores Project 2025's origins and goals to reshape American culture: https://youtu.be/z7rASQFXZjM?feature=shared
 
Fox Affiliate reporting that Trump denies knowing much about Project 2025: https://youtu.be/_jmXS87BmnU?feature=shared
 
MSNBC: Shows Project 2025 architects who are now in Trump’s administration: https://youtu.be/LnGsyz4-xf4?feature=shared
 

Honorable Mention:
 
Occupy Wall Street (2011) matters in this bigger story, even though it fizzled as a movement. Here’s why it’s significant:
 
1. It shifted the vocabulary
Occupy gave us “the 99% vs. the 1%.” That framing of inequality has stuck around for over a decade, shaping how people talk about wealth gaps, billionaires, and corporate influence. Even politicians today (from AOC to Bernie to Elizabeth Warren) still tap that language.
 
2. It exposed the frustration pipeline
Occupy was leaderless, messy, and didn’t produce a policy agenda — but it revealed the raw anger at institutions after the 2008 crash. That anger didn’t just vanish: some of it fueled progressive movements (e.g., Sanders’ runs), while another slice of it got redirected into populist-right outrage (Tea Party, Trumpism). Same emotional energy, different channels.
 
3. It previewed the social-media era of protest
Occupy was one of the first big U.S. movements to be amplified and organized through Twitter and livestreams. That “digital-first” activism style later powered Black Lives Matter, Women’s Marches, and even January 6 organizing on the right.
 
4. It failed at structure, and that was instructive
Occupy never turned its energy into durable institutions, laws, or elections. Compare that with the Progressive Era or Project 2025: those are playbooks with infrastructure, leaders, and funding. Occupy showed what happens when you have outrage without architecture.
 
So, significance?
Occupy wasn’t Project 2025’s mirror image, but it was a warning shot: if you don’t harness discontent into a coherent agenda, someone else will. You could argue Project 2025 is the conservative side learning that lesson — building a manual so their movement doesn’t dissolve into tents and hashtags.

---